The conundrum: Boot Camp is easy to use and readily available in OS X, while Parallels is. If you have a tech or buying/selling-related question, please check out our Daily Advice Thread or r/AppleHelp! CommunityTrying to answer that question can prove to be a daunting task for many Mac users, based on my experience. Parallels runs nearly all Windows programs that do not require 3D graphics with a reasonable performance hit.Welcome to r/Apple, the unofficial community for Apple news, rumors, and discussions. A Windows license for XPSP2 is also required. A reboot is currently required to get into Bootcamp so you can’t run Mac and Windows applications at the same time. Bootcamp performs very well at 1) but fails utterly on points 2 and 3.
![]() We may approve your post if it is a high-level issue that can't be found through searches, or if it affects a large amount of people. No support questions outside of the Daily Advice Thread. No posts that aren’t directly related to Apple or the Apple eco-system. No rude, offensive, or hateful comments. No editorialized link titles (use the original source's title if applicable). Posts must foster reasonable discussion. The proper place for advice is /r/AppleWhatShouldIBuy. No posts or comments relating to buying, selling, trading, giveaways or asking for advice about any of those topics. No content related to piracy or illegal activities. Bootcamp Or Parallels Install Windows OntoHere are my thoughts on it:First off, let's cover what each of these does:Bootcamp installs to a physical partition on your Hard Drive, Both Parallels and Fusion create a Virtual Drive on top of your existing hard drive, that you then install Windows onto. If you'd like to view their content together, click here.This subreddit is not endorsed or sponsored by Apple Inc.So I've used Parallels and Fusion pretty extensively over the last couple years and Bootcamp to a point. This fundamental difference in audience is why we support two communities, r/Apple and r/AppleHelp. Apple SubredditsContent which benefits the community (news, rumors, and discussions) is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, etc.). Comments that are spreading COVID vaccine misinformation/claims are not allowed.Ask in our Daily Advice Thread or in our dedicated sister sub /r/AppleWhatShouldIBuy! See also the iPhone Upgrade Wiki for more information. These belong in the beta subreddits listed below. I honestly found the having to reboot thing really obnoxious and not worth it for me for how little I used Windows. You also get the added benefit of Snapshots with both Parallels and Fusion, so you can take a snapshot of your Windows installation, install something on Windows and if it totally breaks your install, you can roll back in about 5-10 minutes.Bootcamp is great, but you have to reboot to get into Windows. However, with Parallels and Fusion, if you decide that you hate Windows and want to uninstalls it, or you want to try something new, getting rid of it is as easy as deleting a file. For a lot of people this is a bonus, but I considered it just extra resources that I didn't want being eaten up in the OS. Parallels installs some random third party software within Windows by default for Ease of Access (at least on Windows 8) such as Start8. A few other things of note. I personally didn't like that, but to each their own. Xbox live for macInstead of the Windows apps showing up in Launchpad, they are segregated off into a single icon that turns into the 'Start Menu' at the very top right of OS X next to the Wireless Icon. The integration isn't as nice, but it's still a very nice product. Last time I checked it was around $70 for a single license.Fusion is basically Parallels, except by VMware. My more graphic intensive games choked on Parallels quite frequently, but worked just fine on Fusion.Overall, Parallels and Fusion are pretty close to being on par with each other. I also found that gaming worked better on Fusion than it did on Parallels. For the same price as one Parallels license, you get 3 for Fusion, which was important to me because we have 3 Macs in the house. The big thing for me was that the licensing is way better for Fusion than Parallels. Fusion doesn't come with the extra app installs, so when you install the OS, it's just that, the bare bones OS, with the appropriate drives already installed. Things are moved around a bit, but everything works fine. I go back and forth between it and my work laptop which has Office 2013 for Windows on it's basically the same product. Unlike Office 2011 which was a complete joke, Office 2016 is really good. (Though as other people mentioned, it sounds like you can use the same Windows install for Parallels and Bootcamp, so hey maybe go for it anyways).A final thought, If you just need it for Office, just get Office 2016 for Mac. For what your needs are, I don't think Bootcamp is the way to go. I liked Fusion better, mostly because of licensing and wound up going with that. ![]() Not sure of the Outlook situation. Note that the MS Office suite is on Mac, too. It's the better option for games as applications run directly on the hardware (so they can access the video card without overhead) but until you reboot, noa ccess to Mac stuff.Both have advantages and disadvantages.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorPrince ArchivesCategories |